From f9ae4391568cfcbf4e6de0475bddcdd68e9b31d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@fau.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:34:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Finish current function before starting next one

When BasicBlocks appear in multiple functions, we ran into the situation
where a unfinished basicblock is included in a different function and
causing bad loops as it's end address wasn't set yet
---
 src/disassembler/llvm/LLVMDisassembler.cxx | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/disassembler/llvm/LLVMDisassembler.cxx b/src/disassembler/llvm/LLVMDisassembler.cxx
index 875a474..1f1cdff 100644
--- a/src/disassembler/llvm/LLVMDisassembler.cxx
+++ b/src/disassembler/llvm/LLVMDisassembler.cxx
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ Function* LLVMDisassembler<ELFT>::disassembleFunctionAt(uint64_t address, const
 
 template <typename ELFT>
 void LLVMDisassembler<ELFT>::disassembleFunction(Function* function) {
+	std::vector<uint64_t> called_functions;
 	std::stack<BasicBlock*> remaining_blocks;
 	/* TODO:
 	 * Do all blocks get added properly? We should take care to remove
@@ -249,7 +250,7 @@ void LLVMDisassembler<ELFT>::disassembleFunction(Function* function) {
 					if (!MIA->isIndirectBranch(inst)) {
 						if (MIA->isCall(inst)) {
 							if (NULL == manager->getFunction(jmptarget))
-								disassembleFunctionAt(jmptarget);
+								called_functions.push_back(jmptarget);
 						} else {
 							current_block->setNextBlock(0, jmptarget);
 							if (new_blocks.find(jmptarget) == new_blocks.end()) {
@@ -298,6 +299,8 @@ void LLVMDisassembler<ELFT>::disassembleFunction(Function* function) {
 	splitBlocks(function);
 	LOG4CXX_DEBUG(logger, "Finished function " << function->getName());
 	manager->finishFunction(function);
+	for (uint64_t address : called_functions)
+		disassembleFunctionAt(address);
 }
 
 template <typename ELFT>
-- 
2.39.2